Activist Chloe Cole, known for her anti-transgender views, is scheduled to give a speech at the Grand Valley State University (GVSU). Despite the controversy surrounding her, the university has chosen not to cancel the event, adhering to its commitment to freedom of speech. Cole’s talks are frequently incendiary, as she denies the validity and existence of transgender identities, which has garnered criticism from advocates for transgender rights.
GVSU representatives expressed their stance on the situation, saying, “Whilst we do not endorse Ms. Cole’s views, we uphold the principle of freedom of speech as a fundamental academic value. Our university is a place where individuals can engage in open dialogue, including views that may challenge or offend others.” It’s the belief that exposure to a wide range of ideas, even those that are uncomfortable or contesting, promotes educational growth and development.
Critics assert that hosting Cole may send a negative message to the GVSU community, particularly to transgender students who might feel invalidated or threatened by her stance. Further, activist groups have called for a boycott of the event, arguing that providing a platform to such views normalises discrimination and spreads harmful stereotypes about transgender people.
Based on her past speeches and online content, Cole’s stance is clear: she denies the existence of transgender identity, calling it a ‘social trend’ rather than a deeply ingrained feature of individual identity. However, these views have been heavily disputed by numerous studies and professionals in the field of psychology and human sexuality, who affirm that gender identity is not a choice, and can differ from biological sex.
Cole’s scheduled appearance at GVSU continues under significant scrutiny and opposing public opinions. While freedom of speech and a commitment to open dialogue underpin this decision, the fear remains that the event could foster an environment unwelcoming to GVSU’s transgender community. Regardless of viewpoints, Cole’s visit is undoubtedly set to stir significant conversation and reflection on the values of the university, its community, and its commitment to inclusivity versus freedom of speech.
Last modified: March 13, 2025